On 2 June 2014, the Act was tailored to Telangana as the Telangana Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2002. It defines marriage as “all marriages performed by persons belonging to any caste or religion and in addition the marriages carried out as per any custom, practices or any traditions together with the marriages carried out in the tribal areas and the phrase ‘marriage’ additionally includes ‘remarriage'”. It defines marriage as “all marriages performed by individuals belonging to any caste or religion under any regulation for the time being in power, or as per any custom or utilization in any form or method and likewise contains remarriage”. The court ordered the state authorities to register the marriage of a man and a transgender woman, Shri Arunkumar and Ms. Srija, which had been performed in October 2018 in Thoothukudi in accordance with Hindu custom. The court docket reiterated precedent it had set in its 2020 ruling in Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh. The court docket ruled that the refusal to register the marriage discriminated on the basis of gender identity in violation of the Supreme Court’s ruling in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India. The couple later filed a lawsuit, Supriyo v. Union of India, searching for legal recognition for his or her marriage under the SMA.
Following their marriage ceremony in October, the Registrar of Marriages had refused to certify the marriage and difficulty a license, arguing that the couple couldn’t marry under the HMA and that the dictionary definition of bride excluded transgender girls. In August 2004, Governor Dinesh Nandan Sahay signed the Tripura Recording of Marriage Act, 2003 into law. The Act supplies for the registration of all marriages solemnized in Tripura no matter the religion or caste of the parties. The Act offers for the registration of all marriages solemnized in Rajasthan regardless of the religion of the events. All marriages carried out in Uttar Pradesh should be registered with the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017. The principles present for the registration of all marriages solemnized in the state irrespective of the religion or caste of the parties. It does not explicitly prohibit same-intercourse marriages, and defines marriage simply as together with remarriage. A nātā prathā is formalized by means of a written settlement and the cost of a bride worth, and they are known instances of similar-intercourse couples coming into into the association.
The Act typically refers to married spouses as “bride and bridegroom”. However, the Act usually refers to married spouses as “husband and wife”. In 2009, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly passed the Tamil Nadu Registration of Marriages Act, 2009, which was signed into legislation by Governor Surjit Singh Barnala in August 2009. The Act offers for the registration of all marriages in Tamil Nadu “carried out on and from the date of commencement of this Act”. In keeping with a 2019 report titled “Politics and Society Between Elections 2019”, revealed by the Azim Premji Foundation and Lokniti-CSDS, Tamil Nadu ranked third in the nation in terms of acceptance of identical-sex unions, after Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. Based on a 2019 report titled “Politics and Society Between Elections 2019”, printed by the Azim Premji Foundation and Lokniti-CSDS, Uttar Pradesh ranked first in the nation by way of acceptance of same-intercourse unions. Responding to the controversy, MP Shashi Tharoor said the social gathering had but to announce an official position on similar-intercourse marriage.
The wedding proved controversial, with the Jathedar of the Akal Takht condemning the wedding as “a severe moral and religious violation” which is “unnatural and contrary to Sikh ethics”. On 18 December 2021, two men, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang, have been married in a Hindu ceremony in Hyderabad, making “it the first gay marriage ceremony within the Telugu States”. In December 2022, a identical-sex couple, Kahran Singh and Gourav Tarafdar, had been married in a traditional Hindu wedding ceremony in Jaisalmer alongside household and friends. The union shouldn’t be legally recognised in Rajasthan, and it is understood that some members of the family of the couple were opposed to the wedding. In May 2023, the local chapter of the Hindu-nationalist Vishwa Hindu Parishad organisation urged the Supreme Court to reject the case searching for to legalise similar-intercourse marriage, claiming that “Hindu society and heterogenous marriage tradition would be destroyed” if same-intercourse marriage have been legalised. Some same-sex couples have married in traditional marriage ceremonies, though the marriages don’t have any authorized standing in Uttar Pradesh. Reported within the media as Punjab’s “first gay marriage”, a lesbian couple have been married as per conventional Hindu customs on 22 April 2017 in Jalandhar, alongside household and mates. In 2004, two young Muslim men were married in Ghaziabad but had been physically assaulted by relations when it was reported that they meant to continue living together.